COVID-19 did not result in increased hospitalization for stroke and transient ischemic attack:A nationwide study

BACKGROUND: The risk of thrombosis increases in infectious diseases, yet observational studies from single centers have shown a decrease in admission of acute ischemic stroke patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic. To investigate unselected stroke admission rates we performed a nationwide study in Denmark. METHODS: We extracted information from Danish national health registries. The following mutually exclusive time periods were compared to the year before the lockdown: (1) first national lockdown, (2) gradual reopening, (3) few restrictions, (4) regional lockdown, and (5) second national lockdown. RESULTS: Generally, admission rates were unchanged during the pandemic. In the unadjusted data, we observed a small decrease in the admission rate for all strokes under the first lockdown (incidence rate ratio: 0.93, confidence interval [CI]: 0.87–0.99) and a slight increase during the periods with gradual reopening, few restrictions, and the regional lockdown driven by ischemic strokes. We found no change in the rate of severe strokes, mild strokes, or 30‐day mortality. An exception was the higher mortality for all strokes during the first lockdown (risk ratio: crude 1.30 [CI: 1.03–1.59]; adjusted 1.17 [CI: 0.93–1.47]). The quality of care remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Stroke admission rates remained largely unchanged during the pandemic, while an increased short‐term mortality rate in patients admitted with stroke observed during the first lockdown was seen, probably reflecting that the more frail patients constituted a higher proportion of admitted patients at the beginning of the pandemic

Diagnostic performance of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Prehospital Stroke Scale for identification of stroke and stroke subtypes in an unselected patient cohort with symptom onset < 4.5 h

INTRODUCTION: Rapid identification and treatment of stroke is crucial for the outcome of the patient. We aimed to determine the performance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) independently and in combination with the Prehospital Stroke Score (PreSS) for identification and differentiation of acute stroke within 4.5 h after symptom onset. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data and serum samples were collected from the Treat-Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project (Treat-NASPP). Patients with suspected stroke and symptoms lasting ≤ 4.5 h had blood samples collected and were evaluated with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale prospectively. In this sub study, NIHSS was retrospectively translated into PreSS and GFAP was measured using the sensitive single molecule array (SIMOA). RESULTS: A total of 299 patients with suspected stroke were recruited from Treat-NASPP and included in this study (44% acute ischemic stroke (AIS), 10% intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH), 7% transient ischemic attack (TIA), and 38% stroke mimics). ICrH was identified with a cross-fold validated area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.73 (95% CI 0.62–0.84). A decision tree with PreSS and GFAP combined, first identified patients with a low probability of stroke. Subsequently, GFAP detected patients with ICrH with a 25.0% sensitivity (95% CI 11.5–43.4) and 100.0% specificity (95% CI 98.6–100.0). Lastly, patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) were detected with a 55.6% sensitivity (95% CI 35.3–74.5) and 82.4% specificity (95% CI 77.3–86.7). CONCLUSION: In unselected patients with suspected stroke, GFAP alone identified ICrH. Combined in a decision tree, GFAP and PreSS identified subgroups with high proportions of stroke mimics, ICrH, LVO, and AIS (non-LVO strokes)

Quality in stroke care during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic:A nationwide study

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based early stroke care as reflected by fulfillment of process performance measures, is strongly related to better patient outcomes after stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Detailed data on the resilience of stroke care services during the COVID-19 pandemic are limited. We aimed to examine the quality of early stroke care at Danish hospitals during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We extracted data from Danish national health registries in five time periods (11 March, 2020–27 January, 2021) and compared these to a baseline pre-pandemic period (13 March, 2019–10 March, 2020). Quality of early stroke care was assessed as fulfilment of individual process performance measures and as a composite measure (opportunity-based score). RESULTS: A total of 23,054 patients were admitted with stroke and 8153 with a TIA diagnosis in the entire period. On a national level, the opportunity-based score (95% confidence interval [CI]) at baseline for ischemic patients was 81.1% (80.8–81.4), for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) 85.5% (84.3–86.6), and for TIA 96.0% (95.3–96.1). An increase of 1.1% (0.1–2.2) and 1.5% (0.3–2.7) in the opportunity-based score was observed during the first national lockdown period for AIS and TIA followed by a decline of −1.3% (−2.2 to −0.4) in the gradual reopening phase for AIS indicators. We found a significant negative association between regional incidence rates and quality-of-care in ischemic stroke patients implying that quality decreases when admission rates increase. CONCLUSION: The quality of acute stroke/TIA care in Denmark remained high during the early phases of the pandemic and only minor fluctuations occurred

TRIAGE-STROKE:Treatment strategy In Acute larGE vessel occlusion: Prioritize IV or endovascular treatment-A randomized trial

RATIONALE: For patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusions, intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy are standard of care, but the effect of endovascular therapy is superior to intravenous thrombolysis. If a severe stroke with symptoms indicating large vessel occlusions occurs in the catchment area of a primary stroke center, there is equipoise regarding optimal transport strategy.AIM: For patients presenting with suspected large vessel occlusions (PASS ≥ 2) and a final diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, we hypothesize that bypassing the primary stroke center will result in an improved 90-day functional outcome.SAMPLE SIZE: We aim to randomize 600 patients, 1:1.DESIGN: A national investigator-driven, multi-center, randomized assessor-blinded clinical trial. The Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale has been developed. It identifies most patients with large vessel occlusions in the pre-hospital setting. Patients without a contraindication for intravenous thrombolysis are randomized to either transport directly to a comprehensive stroke centers for intravenous thrombolysis and of endovascular therapy or to a primary stroke center for intravenous thrombolysis and subsequent transport to a comprehensive stroke centers for of endovascular therapy, if needed.OUTCOMES: The primary outcome will be the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) for all patients with acute ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes include 90-day mRS for all randomized patients, all patients with ischemic stroke but without large vessel occlusions, and patients with hemorrhagic stroke. The safety outcomes include severe dependency or death and time to intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke patients.DISCUSSION: Study results will influence decision making regarding transport strategy for patients with suspected large vessel occlusions.</p

Standard Versus Individualized Blood Pressure Targets During Thrombectomy: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Background The optimal blood pressure management strategy in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke is unknown. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of a standard versus individualized blood pressure management strategy during endovascular therapy. Methods This randomized controlled pilot trial included adult patients with acute ischemic stroke with large‐vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation undergoing endovascular therapy. Patients were randomized to either standard (mean arterial blood pressure [MABP] targeted between 70 and 90 mm Hg) or individualized (MABP targeted ±10% of a baseline value measured in the neurointerventional suite) blood pressure targets until reperfusion or removal of groin sheath. The main outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included feasibility outcomes, 90‐day dichotomized modified Rankin Scale score (0–2 versus 3–6), and reperfusion rates. Results Between April 2021 and February 2022, 60 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 76 [66–84] years) were randomly assigned to standard (n=30) or individualized (n=30) blood pressure targets. Median (interquartile range) National institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 15 (10–18). Mean (SD) MABP, mean (SD) systolic blood pressure, and median (interquartile range) cardiac output were significantly higher in the individualized group compared with the standard group (MABP: 94 [9] versus 88 [9] mm Hg; P=0.012; systolic blood pressure: 149 [21] versus 139 [17] mm Hg; P=0.032; and cardiac output: 5.82 [4.22–7.23] versus 4.35 [3.73–5.1] L/min; P=0.02). The odds ratio for improved outcome in the individualized group was 1.37 (95% CI, 0.56–3.36). The relative risk for improved dichotomized outcome in the individualized group was 1.31 (95% CI, 0.87–1.98). Full reperfusion rates were comparable between the standard and individualized groups (90% versus 93%; P=0.64). The median percentage of time outside the MABP targets was 54.3% in the standard group versus 61.4% in the individual group (P=0.30) and did not meet the feasibility target. Recruitment rate, data completeness, and safety were within feasibility limits. Conclusions The feasibility criteria were not met in this study because of difficulties in achieving the desired blood pressure targets. These findings do not support continuing with a large trial using the current protocol

Transport Strategy in Patients With Suspected Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: TRIAGE-STROKE, a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: When patients with acute ischemic stroke present with suspected large vessel occlusion in the catchment area of a primary stroke center (PSC), the benefit of direct transport to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) has been suggested. Equipoise remains between transport strategies and the best transport strategy is not well established. METHODS: We conducted a national investigator-driven, multicenter, randomized, assessor-blinded clinical trial. Patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) who were suspected for large vessel occlusion were randomized 1:1 to admission to the nearest PSC (prioritizing IVT) or direct CSC admission (prioritizing endovascular therapy). The primary outcome was functional improvement at day 90 for all patients with acute ischemic stroke, measured as shift towards a lower score on the modified Rankin Scale score. RESULTS: From September 2018 to May 2022, we enrolled 171 patients of whom 104 had acute ischemic stroke. The trial was halted before full recruitment. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Primary analysis of shift in modified Rankin Scale (ordinal logistic regression) revealed an odds ratio for functional improvement at day 90 of 1.42 (95% CI, 0.72–2.82, P=0.31). Onset to groin time for patients with large vessel occlusion was 35 minutes (P=0.007) shorter when patients were transported to a CSC first, whereas onset to needle (IVT) was 30 minutes (P=0.012) shorter when patients were transported to PSC first. IVT was administered in 67% of patients in the PSC group versus 78% in the CSC group and EVT was performed in 53% versus 63% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This trial investigated the benefit of bypassing PSC. We included only IVT-eligible patients presenting &lt;4 hours from onset and with suspected large vessel occlusion. Lack of power prevented the results from showing effect on functional outcome for patients going directly to CSC.</p

Quality in stroke care during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide study

Introduction:Evidence-based early stroke care as reflected by fulfillment of process performance measures, is strongly related to better patient outcomes after stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Detailed data on the resilience of stroke care services during the COVID-19 pandemic are limited. We aimed to examine the quality of early stroke care at Danish hospitals during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.Materials and methods:We extracted data from Danish national health registries in five time periods (11 March, 2020–27 January, 2021) and compared these to a baseline pre-pandemic period (13 March, 2019–10 March, 2020). Quality of early stroke care was assessed as fulfilment of individual process performance measures and as a composite measure (opportunity-based score).Results:A total of 23,054 patients were admitted with stroke and 8153 with a TIA diagnosis in the entire period. On a national level, the opportunity-based score (95% confidence interval [CI]) at baseline for ischemic patients was 81.1% (80.8–81.4), for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) 85.5% (84.3–86.6), and for TIA 96.0% (95.3–96.1). An increase of 1.1% (0.1–2.2) and 1.5% (0.3–2.7) in the opportunity-based score was observed during the first national lockdown period for AIS and TIA followed by a decline of −1.3% (−2.2 to −0.4) in the gradual reopening phase for AIS indicators. We found a significant negative association between regional incidence rates and quality-of-care in ischemic stroke patients implying that quality decreases when admission rates increase.Conclusion:The quality of acute stroke/TIA care in Denmark remained high during the early phases of the pandemic and only minor fluctuations occurred

Quality in stroke care during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide study

Introduction:Evidence-based early stroke care as reflected by fulfillment of process performance measures, is strongly related to better patient outcomes after stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Detailed data on the resilience of stroke care services during the COVID-19 pandemic are limited. We aimed to examine the quality of early stroke care at Danish hospitals during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.Materials and methods:We extracted data from Danish national health registries in five time periods (11 March, 2020–27 January, 2021) and compared these to a baseline pre-pandemic period (13 March, 2019–10 March, 2020). Quality of early stroke care was assessed as fulfilment of individual process performance measures and as a composite measure (opportunity-based score).Results:A total of 23,054 patients were admitted with stroke and 8153 with a TIA diagnosis in the entire period. On a national level, the opportunity-based score (95% confidence interval [CI]) at baseline for ischemic patients was 81.1% (80.8–81.4), for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) 85.5% (84.3–86.6), and for TIA 96.0% (95.3–96.1). An increase of 1.1% (0.1–2.2) and 1.5% (0.3–2.7) in the opportunity-based score was observed during the first national lockdown period for AIS and TIA followed by a decline of −1.3% (−2.2 to −0.4) in the gradual reopening phase for AIS indicators. We found a significant negative association between regional incidence rates and quality-of-care in ischemic stroke patients implying that quality decreases when admission rates increase.Conclusion:The quality of acute stroke/TIA care in Denmark remained high during the early phases of the pandemic and only minor fluctuations occurred